| |
Main Events /Past History
|
| Adishakti was created
in 1981 as a theatre company in Mumbai. Its main activity
then was to create performances, which were already scripted.
Some of these performances were Sophocles' Oedipus ,
(1982) Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead ,
(1983 ) Euripedes' Trojan Women (1984).
|

Naseerudin Shah in Odeipus |
Excellent
performances highlight “Oedipus” The
composition and body-lines in the intimate scene between
Jocasta and Oedipus displayed the visual sensitivity
of the director. The use of eyes was a very good directorial
touch that belonged exclusively to Veenapani Chawla.---Mid
Day 26-8-1981. |
| |
|
| |
|
Strangely while supposedly revolutionary theatre is becoming decadent, this staging of a Greek tragedy is one of the most progressive endeavors in recent memory. ---it indicates one way out for the state of the art, which seems to have reached stalemate. Veenapani Chawla's version at the Prithvi is a truly modern rending of a classic in a form that restores it to life while rooting it in a vital artistic context. ---------.The Sunday Observer 10-5-1984. |
 |
|
| |
 |
Adishakti's production of Tom Stoppards Rosencrantz and Guilderstern are Dead at the Prithvi is a triumph. ----------------The Sunday Observer Mumbai 5-6-1983.
|
| |
| From 1985 onwards Adishakti started creating
its own texts. Thus A Greater Dawn in 1992, Impressions
of Bhima 1994, Khandava Prastha 1996, Brhannala 1998, Ganapati 2000. |
|
|
| |
If
Veenapani Chawla can take a Greater Dawn, hailed as
a landmark theatre by critics, to other Indian cities,
it could well become a major national theatrical event.
---------The Pioneer Delhi 16-3-1992. |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
The humor
was superbly paced – stealing in craftily, then going
over the top in improvisatory abandon before retuning
to the solemnity of the opening. The absence of a prefatory
note on the production helped. Much of Bhima's sparkle
derived from the fact of an unprepared audience having
to discover its way by itself. -------- The Pioneer
Delhi 25-4-1996 |
| |
| |
|

Usha Nangiyar
in Khandava Prasta -1998 |
|
| |
 |
Brhannala written, choreographed
and directed by Chawla and performed by Vinay Kumar,
-- was the most total work of theatre l have yet to
witness. I use total because I can't come up with a
better word to describe the creators' perfect blend
of spoken language, physical body, music and lights------The
Dance Inside 3-January 2003 |
| |
| Undoubtedly Veenapani Chawla's Ganapati is a radical breakthrough in the history of modern Indian theatre. ----------Editorial NFSC Journal 4-7-2001 |
 |
|
| |
Over
the years certain factors contributed to the nature of Adishakti's
performance activity. Among these were:
- Cinema as the art form of the times was seen
to be invalidating theatre. Adishakti wanted to reinstate
theatre as an art form and widen its scope.
- The cultural
imperatives of postcolonial India and the consequent
need for a new aesthetic for contemporary times.
- Globalization
and the threat of uniformity: the need therefore to guard
specificity of cultural expression while at the same time
looking for similarity in varied cultural practices so
as to mitigate the threat of conflict between “ difference”.
|
| |
| In 1983 Adishakti started
to include research as a part of its
activities. This emerged out of it s need to create a new
language for contemporary performance, which would reflect
a new aesthetic. The initial areas of such research were
the traditional performance forms of India. Adishakti's
first such engagement was with Mayurbhanj Chhau, a dance
based on martial arts from Orissa. From this interaction
evolved an independent vocabulary for expression in the
body, which was used in the Adishakti production of The
Trojan Women, 1984.
|
|
| |
Subrato
Patnaik in
Mayur Bhanj Chhau |
| |
|
Subsequently in 1987 Adishakti felt the need to evolve a sound style for vocal expre ss ion and therefore engaged with Patsy Rodenburg of the RSC in England. On the heel s of this came an interaction with the north Indian music form of Dhrupad, of the vocal style of Koodiyattam theatre, of Samavedic chanting (said to be the origin of music in India) the breath practices of Hatha yoga--- pranayama and the martial art of Kerala, Kalaripayattu, which also has breath practices associated with it. The result of all this work was revealed through Adishakti's A Greater Dawn, 1992 |
| Veenapani
at a Kalari in Chavakkad, Kerala |
|
|
|
In 1989 Adishakti was registered
as a Charitable Trust. In 1993 it shifted base to Pondicherry. And
it was from this point onward that Adishakti's concerns became larger.
It was no longer preoccupied merely with the development of its own
theatrical language and of revitalizing contemporary theatre but also
in offering something to the traditional artist; its partner in dialogue.
In fact Adishakti's relationship with traditional form from this time
onwards was a departure from the existing practice of treating such
forms as hermetically sealed, or only as the object of preservation
and restoration. Adishakti started acting on the premise, that past
disciplines need to be deliberately displaced from their own context
in order to throw up a range of new knowledges within them, not formerly
known or apprehended.
Indeed it regarded the traditional forms as constitutively incomplete
, and attributed, in part, some of their fading appeal, within their
own spectator-communities, not so much to the corruption (through
urbanization etc) of audience taste, but rather to the historical
attrition or paralysis of the forms themselves. Within this understanding,
Adishakti's position was that the contemporary performer is privileged
as a critic whose task it is to reinterpret and, as it were, fill
in the blanks within specific traditional forms. So, in its encounter
with the traditional artist, Adishakti has endeavored, of course,
to clarify its own formal and imaginative directions, but also, and
equally, to stimulate the traditional artist to discover old forms
anew. The encounter, thus, is premised upon a powerful recognition
of mutual worth and capability.
Some examples of this :
By way of Adishakti's exchanges with the Kalaripayattu
guru Ramesh Marikhar of the Hinusthan Kalari Sangham, Calicut, it
has been equipped to adapt the vocabulary of the traditional martial
arts into its performance practices. But this exchange has also helped
the guru himself to discover the unique relation of breath to body
dynamics in the form. While the guru was always unconsciously aware
of this relation, Adishakti's investigations helped him to articulate
and systematize this occluded self-knowledge, contributing enormously
to the performance quality of Kalaripayattu. More recently Adishakti's
focus on the structures and stances of Kalaripayattu and the relationship
of these to the generation of emotion has led the Kalaripayattu master
to re-look at the legendary connection between Kalaripayattu and
Tantra { Tantra is a spiritual practice}; the relationship of the
psychological centers in the body to its centers of energy. |
| |

|
Similar results ensued from a dialogue
with Koodiyattam performer Usha Nangiar, in 1997. (Koodiyattam
is a traditional Sanskrit theatre performance from Kerala.)
Once again, while enormously beneficial to Adishakti in up-scaling its skill-base,
the process helped Usha to draw Koodiyattam training exercises-----such as the
use of breath to generate emotion-----into the space and scope of her formal
performance itself. Other innovations followed. For example, drawing on Adishakti's
use of an unwritten text during performance, Usha was able to reinterpret the
‘ vichinta ' or ‘thoughtful mood' emphasized in the Koodiyattam Attaprakaram
to mean the process of active inner thought throughout performance. Usha's performances
are already much more accessible and ‘fresh' for community audiences. |
| Usha Nangiyar |
|
| |
In 1999, Adishakti began an interaction with Kodiyattam musician and mizhavu (a traditional drum) player, Hariharan, which resulted in the production, Ganapathi , notable for its use of music as text in performance. For Hariharan it led to a greater awareness of the interconnection between the actor's use of breath for the generation of emotion and the patterns of rhythm, which underlie this and which, are reinforced by the percussionist. |

|
| |
V.K.K.Hariharan |
| |
|
|
|
Adishakti's interaction with the tradition has been not
only in the realm of performance. From 2000 Adishakti extended its research
activity into disciplines such as old construction technologies, traditional
medicine and instrument building. It was the pragmatic need of the hour
{ compulsions, which emerged from the development of the campus), which
compelled it to undertake these investigations and they merely reinforced
its growing awareness that knowledge creation is a
crucial exercise for new creativity .
|
| |
| Adishakti Campus |
 |
|
 |
| 1994 |
2000 |
Adishakti Guest House |
 |
 |
 |
| Guest House
Interior |
Adishakti Theatre -Sir
Ratan Tata Koothu Kovil |
Theatre Interior |
|
| |
Although over
the years Adishakti has focused more on what we might call “vertical” connections, viz.; those linking different
historical times (e.g.; traditional-contemporary), in the hope of creating
a new aesthetic of hybridity and a new language of expression for the
aesthetic; for sometime now it has also tried to create “horizontal” connections,
viz. those, which are not chronologically divided. So, for
instance, there has been an attempt to create at Adishakti
the opportunity for new and imaginative exchanges with other disciplines.
For instance those between: physics and contemporary performance-- the
results of which were woven into Brhannalla ; between architecture and performance
in Ganapati ; between prosody and performance in the Hare
and the Tortoise . Indeed the latter work with experts from Sanskrit
prosody{ Chhanda Shastra} is going in multiple directions.
On the one hand Adishakti and its partners in this exploration--
the Tapattam artists {Dalit percussionists from Tamil Nadu} are being
fed by inputs from the Chhanda Shastra to create words and texts on
percussion instruments. On the other Adishakti is being exposed to the
concept of the “breath
pause”{as distinct from the grammatical pause} in text. Sanskrit prosody
marks the breath pause in text to facilitate emotional expression.
Within this category of the “horizontal connections” Adishakti is
currently involved in a collaboration with film maker Soudhamini
towards the creation of a new creative endeavor--- Brhannala the
Film .
Adishakti's dialogues with ‘difference' are not only restricted
to different times { tradition} and different genres but also include
different spaces. Thus there has been a dialogue between the martial
arts of Kerala and that of Orissa { Mayurbhnaj Chhau} at the Adishakti
site since 2000. The idea behind these dialogues has been to touch
upon the similarities in the practices and allow the differences to
stimulate new creativity. Another such dialogue was between Thumari
from North India and Kathakkali from South India in 2002. Both forms
use the principle of repetition in the text of the music as a means
for exploring many shades of emotion, but the aesthetic is different.
In 2003 –2004 Adishakti had its largest inter cultural dialogue
to date. It was between its contemporary performers, Koodiyattam
performer Usha Nangiar from Kerala, Noh performer Wakita Haruko from
Japan and Dr. Rajeshwari Pandey, Professor of Japanese Studies at
Latrobe University, Australia. The interaction aimed to investigate
the manner in which each of the partners in the dialogue employed
breath in performance . The
premise on which the workshop/symposium was based was that
both Noh and Koodiyattam are the only two known traditional forms,
which are similar in the manner in which breath is fundamental to
their practice. Therefore it was believed to be significant for the
two forms to exchange notes on this similarity and
to define the difference in
the manner in which breath is used resulting in the difference in
the aesthetics of the two forms.
|
| |
Winter
Workshop 2003-2004
A Dialogue Between Koodiyattam, Noh and Contemporary
Performance |
| |
 |
|
 |
| Cultural
Psychologist Ashish Nandi |
Academic
and Noh Performer Wakita Haruko |
Workshop Participants |
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Hilary McPhee Vice-Chancellor's
Fellow-
University of Melbourne
|
Koodiyattam Performer Usha Nangiyar |
Dr.
R.Pandey Reader of Japanese Studies, La Trobe University
Australia
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Workshop
Participants |
|
|
|